Статья
Полный текст:
В статье рассматриваются новые подходы к изучению проблемы разделенного правления в зарубежной историографии начала XXI в. Авторы подчеркивают наличие широкого спектра противоречивых точек зрения по основным аспектам раз- деленного правления, анализируют имеющие место дискуссии относительно причин его возникновения и воздействия данной ситуации на формирование внутренней и внешней политики США, его эффективность как модель государственного управления.
1. Лапшина, И.К. Государственная политика в условиях разделенного правления: теоретические аспекты вопроса / И.К. Лапшина // История государства и права. – 2010. –№ 15. – С. 3 – 7.
2. Canes-Wrone, B. Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis / B. Canes-Wrone, W. Howell, D. Lewis // Journal of Politics. – 2008. – № 70.
3. Cohen Jeffrey, E. The Congressional Roots of Presidential Approval. Paper presented at the Campaigns and Elections Seminar, Institute for Public Affairs / E. Cohen Jeffrey // Temple University. – Philadelphia ; PA ; N.Y., 2009.
4. Conley, R. The Presidency, Congress, and Divided government: A Post War Assessment / R. Conley. – College Station, 2002. – Р. 44, 47. – URL: . ru/books?id=EZJOJxvXgIwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=divide d+government...(дата обращения: 07.10.2012).
5. DeLaet, J. Treaty-Making and Partisan Politics: Arms Control and the U.S. Senate, 1960-2001 / J. DeLaet, J. Scott // Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association. – Midwest St. Louis. – 2005. – October 21-22. – P. 67 – 81.
6. Divided Government in Comparative Perspective / Ed.R. Elgie. Dublin City University, Ireland. – 2001. – P. 2. – URL: printsec=frontcover&dq=elgie+divided+government... (дата обращения: 03.04.2012).
7. Feinman, D. Divided Government and Congressional Foreign Policy: a Case Study of the Post-World War II Era in American Government / D. Feinman // The Department of Political Science. University of Central Florida, Orlando, 2011.
8. Fleisher, R. The Demise of the Two Presidencies / R. Fleisher, J. Bond, G. Krutz, S. Hanna // American Politics Quarterly. – 2000. – № 28. – P. 3 – 25.
9. Herron, M. The Source of Gridlock: Divided Government or Preference Conflict? / M. Herron // Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences. – Harvard University ; Cam- bridge ; MA, 2000.
10. Levinson, D. Separation of Parties, Not Powers. Harvard Law Review / D. Levinson, R. Pildes. – 2006.
11. Newman, B. Polls and Elections: Divided Government and Foreign Relations Approval / B. Newman, K. Lammert // Presidential Studies Quarterly. – 2011. – V. 41. – P. 375 – 392.– URL: 5705.2011.03859.x/full (дата обращения: 13.04.2012).
12. Niskanen, W.A. Give Divided Government a Chance /W.A. Niskanen. – URL: . php?pub_id=6713 (дата обращения: 07.10.2013).
13. Peake, J. Coalition Building and Overcoming Legislative Gridlock in Foreign Policy, 1947–98 / J. Peake // Presidential Studies Quarterly 32. – 2002. – № 1.
14. Prins, B. Congressional Support of the President: A Comparison of Foreign, Defense, and Domestic Policymaking during and after the Cold War / B. Prins, B. Marshall // Presidential Studies Quarterly. – 2001. – № 31 (4). – Р. 660 – 678.
15. Rogers, J. The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production / J. Rogers // Public Choice. 2005. – № 123.– P. 217 – 233.
16. Rose, M. Losing Control: The Intraparty Consequences of Divided Government / M. Rose // Political Studies Quarterly. – 2001. – № 31. – Р. 679 – 698.
17. Schraufnagel, S. The two presidencies, 1984–98: a replication and extension / S. Schraufnagel, S. Shellman // Presidential Studies Quarterly. – 2001. – V. 31. – P. 699 – 707. – URL: 2c+1984 (дата обращения: 10.05.2012).
18. Slivinski, S. Would Divided Government Be Better? / S. Slivinski. – URL: pub_id=6650 (дата обращения: 07.10.2012).
19. Wildavsky, A. The Two Presidencies. A Quarter Century Assessment / A. Wildavsky. – Chicago, 1991. – Р. 11 – 17.
2. Canes-Wrone, B. Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis / B. Canes-Wrone, W. Howell, D. Lewis // Journal of Politics. – 2008. – № 70.
3. Cohen Jeffrey, E. The Congressional Roots of Presidential Approval. Paper presented at the Campaigns and Elections Seminar, Institute for Public Affairs / E. Cohen Jeffrey // Temple University. – Philadelphia ; PA ; N.Y., 2009.
4. Conley, R. The Presidency, Congress, and Divided government: A Post War Assessment / R. Conley. – College Station, 2002. – Р. 44, 47. – URL: . ru/books?id=EZJOJxvXgIwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=divide d+government...(дата обращения: 07.10.2012).
5. DeLaet, J. Treaty-Making and Partisan Politics: Arms Control and the U.S. Senate, 1960-2001 / J. DeLaet, J. Scott // Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association. – Midwest St. Louis. – 2005. – October 21-22. – P. 67 – 81.
6. Divided Government in Comparative Perspective / Ed.R. Elgie. Dublin City University, Ireland. – 2001. – P. 2. – URL: printsec=frontcover&dq=elgie+divided+government... (дата обращения: 03.04.2012).
7. Feinman, D. Divided Government and Congressional Foreign Policy: a Case Study of the Post-World War II Era in American Government / D. Feinman // The Department of Political Science. University of Central Florida, Orlando, 2011.
8. Fleisher, R. The Demise of the Two Presidencies / R. Fleisher, J. Bond, G. Krutz, S. Hanna // American Politics Quarterly. – 2000. – № 28. – P. 3 – 25.
9. Herron, M. The Source of Gridlock: Divided Government or Preference Conflict? / M. Herron // Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences. – Harvard University ; Cam- bridge ; MA, 2000.
10. Levinson, D. Separation of Parties, Not Powers. Harvard Law Review / D. Levinson, R. Pildes. – 2006.
11. Newman, B. Polls and Elections: Divided Government and Foreign Relations Approval / B. Newman, K. Lammert // Presidential Studies Quarterly. – 2011. – V. 41. – P. 375 – 392.– URL: 5705.2011.03859.x/full (дата обращения: 13.04.2012).
12. Niskanen, W.A. Give Divided Government a Chance /W.A. Niskanen. – URL: . php?pub_id=6713 (дата обращения: 07.10.2013).
13. Peake, J. Coalition Building and Overcoming Legislative Gridlock in Foreign Policy, 1947–98 / J. Peake // Presidential Studies Quarterly 32. – 2002. – № 1.
14. Prins, B. Congressional Support of the President: A Comparison of Foreign, Defense, and Domestic Policymaking during and after the Cold War / B. Prins, B. Marshall // Presidential Studies Quarterly. – 2001. – № 31 (4). – Р. 660 – 678.
15. Rogers, J. The Impact of Divided Government on Legislative Production / J. Rogers // Public Choice. 2005. – № 123.– P. 217 – 233.
16. Rose, M. Losing Control: The Intraparty Consequences of Divided Government / M. Rose // Political Studies Quarterly. – 2001. – № 31. – Р. 679 – 698.
17. Schraufnagel, S. The two presidencies, 1984–98: a replication and extension / S. Schraufnagel, S. Shellman // Presidential Studies Quarterly. – 2001. – V. 31. – P. 699 – 707. – URL: 2c+1984 (дата обращения: 10.05.2012).
18. Slivinski, S. Would Divided Government Be Better? / S. Slivinski. – URL: pub_id=6650 (дата обращения: 07.10.2012).
19. Wildavsky, A. The Two Presidencies. A Quarter Century Assessment / A. Wildavsky. – Chicago, 1991. – Р. 11 – 17.
Ключевые слова:
Зарубежная историография, разделенное правление, теория двух президентств, двухпартийная система США.
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.